Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owedFinding problems with house after purchaseMade an offer to buy an apartment, but the actual size is smaller than the one that was promised

If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?

What is this called? Old film camera viewer?

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

Calculating Wattage for Resistor in High Frequency Application?

How could a planet have erratic days?

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

Start making guitar arrangements

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?

How to indicate a cut out for a product window

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Why should universal income be universal?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

What is this cable/device?

Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?



Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed


Finding problems with house after purchaseMade an offer to buy an apartment, but the actual size is smaller than the one that was promised













4















I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    5 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    2 hours ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    1 hour ago















4















I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    5 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    2 hours ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    1 hour ago













4












4








4








I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am purchasing a house, and apparently the seller owes more on it than what he listed it for. His realtor is now asking me if I can come up with 4000 dollars to be able to close. Is this legal? If I don't come up with this money (that is technically not my responsibility) will the deal really fall through?







house






share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Tas

1735




1735






New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









user83725user83725

211




211




New contributor




user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user83725 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    5 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    2 hours ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    1 hour ago












  • 1





    you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

    – CQM
    5 hours ago











  • In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

    – Lawrence
    2 hours ago







  • 2





    Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

    – corsiKa
    1 hour ago






  • 2





    So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

    – Tas
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

    – J...
    1 hour ago







1




1





you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

– CQM
5 hours ago





you could wait for the bank to repossess it and buy it at accurate market price at that point in time.

– CQM
5 hours ago













In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

– Lawrence
2 hours ago






In your country of interest, do mortgages remain with the land?

– Lawrence
2 hours ago





2




2





Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

– corsiKa
1 hour ago





Do not discount the possibility you're being lied to.

– corsiKa
1 hour ago




2




2





So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

– Tas
1 hour ago





So the seller has listed their house for say $360k, and you met their offer (as opposed to offering less, not that it should matter), and they accepted your offer, but are now asking for an extra $4k? Or are you still negotiating (they asked $360k, you offered $350k, and they're saying they'd really prefer $354k to cover expenses)?

– Tas
1 hour ago




1




1





This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

– J...
1 hour ago





This depends entirely on what phase of the purchase you are in (and what country you're in). If they've accepted an offer from you then, in most advanced countries, you have a legally binding agreement at whatever terms you've both agreed to. If you've not yet had an offer accepted, then they can ask anything they want, or not sell the house at all.

– J...
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















11














It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago









protected by JoeTaxpayer 1 hour ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11














It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago















11














It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago













11












11








11







It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.






share|improve this answer













It is certainly legal to ask you, but you are of course not required to 'donate' another 4000 - that is your choice.

If the deal falls through because of these 4000, it is the seller's fault, and you could sue him for your damages - whatever you invested/paid to get into this closing. Probably not much, but I wouldn't know. Also, chances are that if he is underwater with his home mortgage, he doesn't have the money to pay you even if you win in court, so you'd end up getting only a worthless sheet of paper.



The deal should not fall through for 4000, though. Normally his bank will accept the deal, and he will end up owing those 4000 to his bank still. The amount is probably small compared to the complete mortgage, and the bank would prefer to get the big chunk now and run after the 4000, instead of potentially getting less or nothing later.

So basically, the seller is just trying to sucker you into covering his 4000-problem.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









AganjuAganju

21.9k43578




21.9k43578







  • 1





    This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

    – DJClayworth
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

    – chepner
    3 hours ago






  • 2





    If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

    – corsiKa
    2 hours ago







1




1





This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

– DJClayworth
4 hours ago





This does assume that the agreement to purchase has reached the binding stage.

– DJClayworth
4 hours ago




1




1





Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

– chepner
3 hours ago





Even if it hasn't, the OP is under no obligation to raise his offer to cover the seller's unexpected expense. The amount the seller still owes does not determine the market value of the house.

– chepner
3 hours ago




2




2





If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

– corsiKa
2 hours ago





If I was a bank and I could sell a house with an underwater mortgage and only lose 4k on the remaining balance, I'd probably jump at the deal. Chances are the longer it takes to sell, the more money I'll lose on it.

– corsiKa
2 hours ago





protected by JoeTaxpayer 1 hour ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



Popular posts from this blog

Станькаў Зьмест Назва | Гісторыя | Насельніцтва | Турыстычная інфармацыя | Галерэя | Асобы | Заўвагі | Крыніцы | Літаратура | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню53°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.2277853°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.22778djvu"Бабёнка – это я понимаю!". Як русіфікавалі тапонімы.Святыя руіны ажываюць210Станькаўв. СтанькаваСтаньково: история и новости - сайт деревниСтанькава: сядзіба Гутэн-Чапскіхррр

J. J. Abrams Índice Traxectoria | Filmografía | Premios | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióne"J.J. Abrams: Biography"Arquivado"'Star Trek' sequel on track"Arquivado"J.J. Abrams Producing Samurai Jack Movie"Arquivado"EXCLUSIVE: J.J. Abrams Goes Into Warp Speed with Star Trek and Beyond"Arquivado"David Semel To Direct Jonah Nolan/J.J. Abrams' CBS Pilot 'Person Of Interest'"Arquivado"Fox orders J.J. Abrams pilot 'Alcatraz'"ArquivadoJ. J. AbramsJ. J. AbramsWorldCat81800131p24091041000XX116709414031616ma11226833654496ID052246713376222X511412nm00091900000 0001 1772 5428no98124254ID0000002883100650044xx0054597000141374297344064w64f2mjx14255303415344

Сэнт-Люіс Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню38°37′38″ пн. ш. 90°11′52″ з. д. / 38.62722° пн. ш. 90.19778° з. д. / 38.62722; -90.1977838°37′38″ пн. ш. 90°11′52″ з. д. / 38.62722° пн. ш. 90.19778° з. д. / 38.62722; -90.19778stlouis-mo.govСэнт-ЛюісAnnual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places – U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division