An unused reference in research paperPublishing Same Research Paper on a National Conference as well as International IEEE conferenceChanging the title of a research paper before the submission of the camera-ready versionWhat will happen to my paper if the status of the accepted paper is “AAR” in a IEEE conferenceShould the distinction between bibliography and reference be maintained when writing a paper?How much can you trust a reference of a paper that is not availableDo I need to add answers to the reviewers’ comments to a conference paper?At what stage should acknowledgements be inserted into the paper if review is not double-blind?Performing minor corrections in a paper after camera-ready deadlineIs it ok to write a follow-up paper for a paper which has been accepted but not available online yet?References must be cited vs. need not be cited

Limits and Infinite Integration by Parts

Lowest total scrabble score

Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

Calculating total slots

Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

It grows, but water kills it

Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Calculate sum of polynomial roots

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

creating a ":KeepCursor" command

Why should universal income be universal?

How do I delete all blank lines in a buffer?

Terse Method to Swap Lowest for Highest?

System.QueryException unexpected token

How can mimic phobia be cured?

Probability that THHT occurs in a sequence of 10 coin tosses

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

Plot of a tornado-shaped surface

Quasinilpotent , non-compact operators

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification



An unused reference in research paper


Publishing Same Research Paper on a National Conference as well as International IEEE conferenceChanging the title of a research paper before the submission of the camera-ready versionWhat will happen to my paper if the status of the accepted paper is “AAR” in a IEEE conferenceShould the distinction between bibliography and reference be maintained when writing a paper?How much can you trust a reference of a paper that is not availableDo I need to add answers to the reviewers’ comments to a conference paper?At what stage should acknowledgements be inserted into the paper if review is not double-blind?Performing minor corrections in a paper after camera-ready deadlineIs it ok to write a follow-up paper for a paper which has been accepted but not available online yet?References must be cited vs. need not be cited













2















I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
for example:




This result1 is cited from [1].

This result2 is cited from [4].



In reference section

[1] cited from here

[2] cited from here

[3] cited from here

[4] cited from here




But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.



Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    2















    I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
    for example:




    This result1 is cited from [1].

    This result2 is cited from [4].



    In reference section

    [1] cited from here

    [2] cited from here

    [3] cited from here

    [4] cited from here




    But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.



    Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2








      I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
      for example:




      This result1 is cited from [1].

      This result2 is cited from [4].



      In reference section

      [1] cited from here

      [2] cited from here

      [3] cited from here

      [4] cited from here




      But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.



      Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I am in a process of camera-ready for the research paper and now paper is in process for camera-ready in publication. I have listed few more reference in reference section of paper which is not reference the text.
      for example:




      This result1 is cited from [1].

      This result2 is cited from [4].



      In reference section

      [1] cited from here

      [2] cited from here

      [3] cited from here

      [4] cited from here




      But I have not referenced [2] and [3] anywhere in the paper.



      Is this paper is valid for publication? Or does it not affect the paper?







      publications






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      Azor Ahai

      4,76411841




      4,76411841






      New contributor




      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 5 hours ago









      Gopal ojhaGopal ojha

      1114




      1114




      New contributor




      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Gopal ojha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.



          1. Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.


          2. Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.


          3. Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.


          I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).






            share|improve this answer























            • Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

              – Jon Custer
              24 mins ago










            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "415"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126914%2fan-unused-reference-in-research-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.



            1. Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.


            2. Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.


            3. Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.


            I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.






            share|improve this answer



























              3














              You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.



              1. Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.


              2. Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.


              3. Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.


              I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.






              share|improve this answer

























                3












                3








                3







                You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.



                1. Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.


                2. Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.


                3. Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.


                I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.






                share|improve this answer













                You have three options. I would consider any of them valid, but an editor might disagree.



                1. Remove the extra references and renumber if necessary.


                2. Put a note somewhere, say with the bibliography, that some references here are just background.


                3. Ignore the problem, assuming that readers will assume 2.


                I think these are in order of decreasing preference, but I wouldn't object to any of them.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                BuffyBuffy

                54k16175268




                54k16175268





















                    2














                    This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

                      – Jon Custer
                      24 mins ago















                    2














                    This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).






                    share|improve this answer























                    • Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

                      – Jon Custer
                      24 mins ago













                    2












                    2








                    2







                    This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).






                    share|improve this answer













                    This depends on the journal's style sheet, but usually you only list the references that are cited in the text. Thus, I would delete the superfluous ones (and renumber the notes).







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 3 hours ago









                    henninghenning

                    18.4k46495




                    18.4k46495












                    • Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

                      – Jon Custer
                      24 mins ago

















                    • Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

                      – Jon Custer
                      24 mins ago
















                    Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

                    – Jon Custer
                    24 mins ago





                    Indeed. Having random unused references in your manuscript is sloppy at best, and is an easy way to indicate to the reviewers that you haven’t proofread it.

                    – Jon Custer
                    24 mins ago










                    Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Gopal ojha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126914%2fan-unused-reference-in-research-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Станькаў Зьмест Назва | Гісторыя | Насельніцтва | Турыстычная інфармацыя | Галерэя | Асобы | Заўвагі | Крыніцы | Літаратура | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню53°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.2277853°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.22778djvu"Бабёнка – это я понимаю!". Як русіфікавалі тапонімы.Святыя руіны ажываюць210Станькаўв. СтанькаваСтаньково: история и новости - сайт деревниСтанькава: сядзіба Гутэн-Чапскіхррр

                    J. J. Abrams Índice Traxectoria | Filmografía | Premios | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióne"J.J. Abrams: Biography"Arquivado"'Star Trek' sequel on track"Arquivado"J.J. Abrams Producing Samurai Jack Movie"Arquivado"EXCLUSIVE: J.J. Abrams Goes Into Warp Speed with Star Trek and Beyond"Arquivado"David Semel To Direct Jonah Nolan/J.J. Abrams' CBS Pilot 'Person Of Interest'"Arquivado"Fox orders J.J. Abrams pilot 'Alcatraz'"ArquivadoJ. J. AbramsJ. J. AbramsWorldCat81800131p24091041000XX116709414031616ma11226833654496ID052246713376222X511412nm00091900000 0001 1772 5428no98124254ID0000002883100650044xx0054597000141374297344064w64f2mjx14255303415344

                    Першая сусьветная вайна Зьмест Чыньнікі | Асноўныя падзеі | Беларусь у гады вайны | Балянс вайны | Глядзіце таксама | Крыніцы | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэнюПершая сусьветная вайна: памяць павінна жыць124 (27489)41990-763xЗападный мир отмечает 90 лет со дня окончания Первой мировой войныПершая сусьветная вайнаСпадчына Першай сусьветнай вайныГісторыя вайныАрхіў дакумэнтаў вайныМапы Эўропы ў ходзе вайныГісторыя пад знакам Пагоні/Першая сусветная вайна і Беларусь