Sort with assumptionsvariable sized lists and using lists as variablesRetaining and reusing a one-to-one mapping from a sortSorting a matrix alphanumericallyRearranging a ListHow can I check if one expression implies another?Generating an Array of VectorsImporting, sorting and exporting listsDeleting Lonely Numbers From a ListApplying multiple functions to a single column in a tableFind positions in which list elements are equal

Can creatures abilities target that creature itself?

Capacitor electron flow

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory

Find a point shared by maximum segments

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

C++ lambda syntax

What's the meaning of "what it means for something to be something"?

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

A seasonal riddle

If the Dominion rule using their Jem'Hadar troops, why is their life expectancy so low?

Get top 1 row value from third table while joining 3 tables mssql

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

How to evaluate the research level of a paper before any publication?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Weird lines in Microsoft Word



Sort with assumptions


variable sized lists and using lists as variablesRetaining and reusing a one-to-one mapping from a sortSorting a matrix alphanumericallyRearranging a ListHow can I check if one expression implies another?Generating an Array of VectorsImporting, sorting and exporting listsDeleting Lonely Numbers From a ListApplying multiple functions to a single column in a tableFind positions in which list elements are equal













5












$begingroup$


I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    36 mins ago















5












$begingroup$


I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    36 mins ago













5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a list which looks like this



list = 0, Subscript[x,7], -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9];



and all the $x_i$'s are positive semidefinite (i.e. nonnegative) real numbers. I would like to be able to sort this into



sortedlist = -Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9], -Subscript[x,9], 0, Subscript[x,7]



How do I achieve this? I tried



Assuming[Subscript[x,3] > 0 && Subscript[x,7] > 0 && Subscript[x,9] > 0, Sort[list]]



But this obviously does not work. In general, I'd like to be able to impose more constraints on the $x_i's$ when they're being sorted.







list-manipulation symbolic array sorting






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 58 mins ago









leastactionleastaction

23229




23229







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    36 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
    $endgroup$
    – mikado
    36 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
$endgroup$
– mikado
36 mins ago




$begingroup$
An interesting idea, but a symbolic list where you have an ordering for all the elements is rare
$endgroup$
– mikado
36 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here is a possibility:



sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
Sort[list, order]
]


For your example:



sortWithAssumptions[
0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
] //TeXForm



$left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




Another example:



sortWithAssumptions[
0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
] //TeXForm



$left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, Carl!
    $endgroup$
    – leastaction
    30 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$

How about:



list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



-Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
    $endgroup$
    – leastaction
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
    $endgroup$
    – Kuba
    36 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
    $endgroup$
    – leastaction
    32 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Kuba
    29 mins ago


















3












$begingroup$

Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

(* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



    Assuming[
    Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
    FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
    (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


    This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193600%2fsort-with-assumptions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        30 mins ago















      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        30 mins ago













      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$

      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Here is a possibility:



      sortWithAssumptions[list_, assum_] := Module[order,
      order[a_, b_] := Simplify[a < b, assum];
      Sort[list, order]
      ]


      For your example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7right$




      Another example:



      sortWithAssumptions[
      0,Subscript[x,7],-Subscript[x,3]-Subscript[x,9],-Subscript[x,9], Subscript[x,9],
      Subscript[x,3]>0&&Subscript[x,7]>0&&Subscript[x,9]>0&&Subscript[x,7]<Subscript[x,9]
      ] //TeXForm



      $left-x_3-x_9,-x_9,0,x_7,x_9right$








      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 33 mins ago









      Carl WollCarl Woll

      70.8k394184




      70.8k394184











      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        30 mins ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Thank you, Carl!
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        30 mins ago















      $begingroup$
      Thank you, Carl!
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      30 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Thank you, Carl!
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      30 mins ago











      4












      $begingroup$

      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        32 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        29 mins ago















      4












      $begingroup$

      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        32 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        29 mins ago













      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      How about:



      list[[Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1]]]



      -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7]




      So basically we sort it the way it would be sorted with all subscripts == 1.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 40 mins ago









      KubaKuba

      106k12209530




      106k12209530











      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        32 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        29 mins ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        36 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
        $endgroup$
        – leastaction
        32 mins ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
        $endgroup$
        – Kuba
        29 mins ago















      $begingroup$
      Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      36 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Thanks! Seems to work like a charm, but can you shed some light on why?
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      36 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      36 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @leastaction just take a look at list /. _Subscript -> 1 and at Ordering[list /. _Subscript -> 1].
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      36 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      32 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      I see, so you basically assigned the value $x_i = 1$ to each $x_i$. It works in this case, but generically, $x_i$'s may be different.
      $endgroup$
      – leastaction
      32 mins ago




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      29 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @leastaction sure, which means there isn't one correct answer so every valid within constraints is correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Kuba
      29 mins ago











      3












      $begingroup$

      Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

      (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

        (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

          (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Sort[list, TrueQ@Simplify[#1 < #2, _Subscript > 0] &]

          (* Out: -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 32 mins ago









          MarcoBMarcoB

          37.6k556113




          37.6k556113





















              3












              $begingroup$

              In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



              Assuming[
              Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
              FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
              (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


              This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



                Assuming[
                Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
                FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
                (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


                This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



                  Assuming[
                  Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
                  FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
                  (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


                  This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  In this case, we can use RankedMin and FullSimplify to get the answer you seek



                  Assuming[
                  Subscript[x, 3] > 0 && Subscript[x, 7] > 0 && Subscript[x, 9] > 0,
                  FullSimplify[Table[RankedMin[list, i], i, 1, Length[list]]]]
                  (* -Subscript[x, 3] - Subscript[x, 9], -Subscript[x, 9], 0, Subscript[x, 7] *)


                  This has the advantage of not returning a (potentially) wrong answer if the sort order is uncertain.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 24 mins ago

























                  answered 32 mins ago









                  mikadomikado

                  6,7071929




                  6,7071929



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193600%2fsort-with-assumptions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Станькаў Зьмест Назва | Гісторыя | Насельніцтва | Турыстычная інфармацыя | Галерэя | Асобы | Заўвагі | Крыніцы | Літаратура | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню53°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.2277853°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.22778djvu"Бабёнка – это я понимаю!". Як русіфікавалі тапонімы.Святыя руіны ажываюць210Станькаўв. СтанькаваСтаньково: история и новости - сайт деревниСтанькава: сядзіба Гутэн-Чапскіхррр

                      J. J. Abrams Índice Traxectoria | Filmografía | Premios | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióne"J.J. Abrams: Biography"Arquivado"'Star Trek' sequel on track"Arquivado"J.J. Abrams Producing Samurai Jack Movie"Arquivado"EXCLUSIVE: J.J. Abrams Goes Into Warp Speed with Star Trek and Beyond"Arquivado"David Semel To Direct Jonah Nolan/J.J. Abrams' CBS Pilot 'Person Of Interest'"Arquivado"Fox orders J.J. Abrams pilot 'Alcatraz'"ArquivadoJ. J. AbramsJ. J. AbramsWorldCat81800131p24091041000XX116709414031616ma11226833654496ID052246713376222X511412nm00091900000 0001 1772 5428no98124254ID0000002883100650044xx0054597000141374297344064w64f2mjx14255303415344

                      Першая сусьветная вайна Зьмест Чыньнікі | Асноўныя падзеі | Беларусь у гады вайны | Балянс вайны | Глядзіце таксама | Крыніцы | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэнюПершая сусьветная вайна: памяць павінна жыць124 (27489)41990-763xЗападный мир отмечает 90 лет со дня окончания Первой мировой войныПершая сусьветная вайнаСпадчына Першай сусьветнай вайныГісторыя вайныАрхіў дакумэнтаў вайныМапы Эўропы ў ходзе вайныГісторыя пад знакам Пагоні/Першая сусветная вайна і Беларусь