Wrapping homogeneous Python objects2019 Community Moderator ElectionPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?

Print a physical multiplication table

Brake pads destroying wheels

Can a medieval gyroplane be built?

Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old

Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?

Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?

Generic TVP tradeoffs?

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables

Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous

Help prove this basic trig identity please!

gerund and noun applications

Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?

How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn

A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle

If "dar" means "to give", what does "daros" mean?

Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions



Wrapping homogeneous Python objects



2019 Community Moderator ElectionPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?










9















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    10 hours ago















9















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    10 hours ago













9












9








9


3






I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question
















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)







python






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

13.8k1987113




13.8k1987113










asked 10 hours ago









TinyTheBrontosaurusTinyTheBrontosaurus

1,34011025




1,34011025







  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    10 hours ago












  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    10 hours ago







2




2





How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago






How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago














is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago





is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



class Wrapper: 
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f


For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






share|improve this answer

























  • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago












  • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    10 hours ago











  • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago











  • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    7 hours ago


















1














I think you have the right idea here



wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type

for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12


Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer

























    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      10 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      7 hours ago















    7














    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer

























    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      10 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      7 hours ago













    7












    7








    7







    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer















    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 10 hours ago

























    answered 10 hours ago









    65026502

    87.3k13115217




    87.3k13115217












    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      10 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      7 hours ago

















    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      10 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      10 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      7 hours ago
















    This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago






    This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago














    @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    10 hours ago





    @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    10 hours ago













    Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago





    Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    10 hours ago













    good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    7 hours ago





    good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    7 hours ago













    1














    I think you have the right idea here



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


    You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



    class WrapperClass(list):
    def __init__(self, api_type):
    self.api_type = api_type

    for func in dir(api_type):
    if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
    setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
    [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

    w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
    o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
    w.append(o1)
    w.append(o2)
    print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
    # [None, None]
    print(w[0].b)
    # 12
    print(w[1].b)
    # 12
    print(o1.b)
    # 12


    Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



    Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



    def append(self, item):
    if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
    raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
    super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





    share|improve this answer





























      1














      I think you have the right idea here



      wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
      for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
      wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


      You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



      class WrapperClass(list):
      def __init__(self, api_type):
      self.api_type = api_type

      for func in dir(api_type):
      if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
      setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
      [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

      w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
      o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
      w.append(o1)
      w.append(o2)
      print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
      # [None, None]
      print(w[0].b)
      # 12
      print(w[1].b)
      # 12
      print(o1.b)
      # 12


      Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



      Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



      def append(self, item):
      if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
      raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
      super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





      share|improve this answer



























        1












        1








        1







        I think you have the right idea here



        wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
        for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
        wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


        You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



        class WrapperClass(list):
        def __init__(self, api_type):
        self.api_type = api_type

        for func in dir(api_type):
        if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
        setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
        [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

        w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
        o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
        w.append(o1)
        w.append(o2)
        print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
        # [None, None]
        print(w[0].b)
        # 12
        print(w[1].b)
        # 12
        print(o1.b)
        # 12


        Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



        Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



        def append(self, item):
        if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
        raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
        super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





        share|improve this answer















        I think you have the right idea here



        wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
        for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
        wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


        You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



        class WrapperClass(list):
        def __init__(self, api_type):
        self.api_type = api_type

        for func in dir(api_type):
        if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
        setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
        [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

        w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
        o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
        w.append(o1)
        w.append(o2)
        print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
        # [None, None]
        print(w[0].b)
        # 12
        print(w[1].b)
        # 12
        print(o1.b)
        # 12


        Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



        Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



        def append(self, item):
        if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
        raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
        super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 9 hours ago

























        answered 9 hours ago









        darkskydarksky

        1,4261224




        1,4261224



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Андора Зьмест Гісторыя | Палітыка | Адміністрацыйны падзел | Геаграфія | Эканоміка | Дэмаграфія | Крыніцы | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню"CIA World Factbook entry: Andorra"."Andorra 2008, Departament d'estadística d'Andorra"Андорарр

            Інфармацыя пра «Том Ўэйтс» Асноўныя зьвесткіАбарона старонкіГісторыя рэдагаваньняўУласьцівасьці старонкіНавігацыйнае мэню