Wrapping homogeneous Python objects2019 Community Moderator ElectionPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?
PTIJ: Why do we blow Shofar on Rosh Hashana and use a Lulav on Sukkos?
Print a physical multiplication table
Brake pads destroying wheels
Can a medieval gyroplane be built?
Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old
Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?
Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?
Generic TVP tradeoffs?
What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
How to terminate ping <dest> &
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables
Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous
Help prove this basic trig identity please!
gerund and noun applications
Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?
How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn
A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle
If "dar" means "to give", what does "daros" mean?
Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?
What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?
Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions
Wrapping homogeneous Python objects
2019 Community Moderator ElectionPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.
class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b
if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)
# etc.
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:
Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.
Code example:
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the
WrappedApi
class would not exist.Code example:
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)I tried using
Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.
And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes
objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes
API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot
, step
, etc.)
python
add a comment |
I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.
class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b
if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)
# etc.
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:
Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.
Code example:
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the
WrappedApi
class would not exist.Code example:
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)I tried using
Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.
And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes
objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes
API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot
, step
, etc.)
python
2
How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
is this referring todef __getitem__(self, i):
? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.
class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b
if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)
# etc.
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:
Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.
Code example:
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the
WrappedApi
class would not exist.Code example:
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)I tried using
Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.
And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes
objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes
API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot
, step
, etc.)
python
I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.
class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b
if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)
# etc.
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:
Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.
Code example:
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the
WrappedApi
class would not exist.Code example:
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)I tried using
Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.
And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes
objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes
API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot
, step
, etc.)
python
python
edited 7 hours ago


Peter Mortensen
13.8k1987113
13.8k1987113
asked 10 hours ago
TinyTheBrontosaurusTinyTheBrontosaurus
1,34011025
1,34011025
2
How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
is this referring todef __getitem__(self, i):
? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
is this referring todef __getitem__(self, i):
? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago
2
2
How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
is this referring to
def __getitem__(self, i):
? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago
is this referring to
def __getitem__(self, i):
? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__
can do the trick
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f
For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []])
after calling x.append(12)
all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.
Note that the return value will always be None
... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list ofNone
s and should return the list, or a list ofNone
s and should returnNone
.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What shouldlen(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?
– 6502
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage ofmatplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I think you have the right idea here
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list
and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.
class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type
for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])
w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12
Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.
Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass
like so,
def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__
can do the trick
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f
For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []])
after calling x.append(12)
all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.
Note that the return value will always be None
... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list ofNone
s and should return the list, or a list ofNone
s and should returnNone
.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What shouldlen(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?
– 6502
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage ofmatplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
add a comment |
If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__
can do the trick
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f
For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []])
after calling x.append(12)
all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.
Note that the return value will always be None
... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list ofNone
s and should return the list, or a list ofNone
s and should returnNone
.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What shouldlen(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?
– 6502
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage ofmatplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
add a comment |
If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__
can do the trick
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f
For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []])
after calling x.append(12)
all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.
Note that the return value will always be None
... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".
If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__
can do the trick
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f
For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []])
after calling x.append(12)
all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.
Note that the return value will always be None
... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
65026502
87.3k13115217
87.3k13115217
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list ofNone
s and should return the list, or a list ofNone
s and should returnNone
.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What shouldlen(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?
– 6502
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage ofmatplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
add a comment |
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list ofNone
s and should return the list, or a list ofNone
s and should returnNone
.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What shouldlen(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?
– 6502
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage ofmatplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.
– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of
None
s and should return the list, or a list of None
s and should return None
.– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of
None
s and should return the list, or a list of None
s and should return None
.– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should
len(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?– 6502
10 hours ago
@jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should
len(x)
return if the contained objects don't answer the same?– 6502
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of
matplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of
matplotlib
gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.– TinyTheBrontosaurus
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I think you have the right idea here
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list
and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.
class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type
for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])
w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12
Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.
Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass
like so,
def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)
add a comment |
I think you have the right idea here
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list
and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.
class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type
for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])
w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12
Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.
Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass
like so,
def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)
add a comment |
I think you have the right idea here
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list
and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.
class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type
for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])
w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12
Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.
Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass
like so,
def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)
I think you have the right idea here
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list
and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.
class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type
for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])
w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12
Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.
Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass
like so,
def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
darkskydarksky
1,4261224
1,4261224
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.
– jonrsharpe
10 hours ago
is this referring to
def __getitem__(self, i):
? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation– TinyTheBrontosaurus
10 hours ago