How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?general formula for partial sum of seriesFinite sum k*x^kgeneral formula for partial sum of seriesFind the sum of the convergent seriesHow do I find the value of a partial sum without calculator?How to Recognize a Geometric SeriesFind the sum of the sequence?How to represent this partial sum?Can the infinite sum of $frac2^2k-15^k+3$ be calculated with the formula of geometric series?Partial sum of general harmonic seriesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationlimit with sum and geometric progression

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

What does "Four-F." mean?

Can a medieval gyroplane be built?

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous

Writing in a Christian voice

Should I be concerned about student access to a test bank?

Print last inputted byte

Are dual Irish/British citizens bound by the 90/180 day rule when travelling in the EU after Brexit?

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

Wrapping homogeneous Python objects

gerund and noun applications

How does 取材で訪れた integrate into this sentence?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

Unfrosted light bulb

Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables

Calculate the frequency of characters in a string

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?

Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?

Brake pads destroying wheels



How is the partial sum of a geometric sequence calculated?


general formula for partial sum of seriesFinite sum k*x^kgeneral formula for partial sum of seriesFind the sum of the convergent seriesHow do I find the value of a partial sum without calculator?How to Recognize a Geometric SeriesFind the sum of the sequence?How to represent this partial sum?Can the infinite sum of $frac2^2k-15^k+3$ be calculated with the formula of geometric series?Partial sum of general harmonic seriesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationlimit with sum and geometric progression













3












$begingroup$


I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$



I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as



$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$



(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)



When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:



$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$



On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:



$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$



But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.



Two questions:



  1. Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?

  2. How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
    $endgroup$
    – Joon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    12 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$



I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as



$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$



(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)



When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:



$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$



On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:



$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$



But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.



Two questions:



  1. Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?

  2. How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
    $endgroup$
    – Joon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    12 hours ago














3












3








3


3



$begingroup$


I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$



I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as



$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$



(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)



When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:



$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$



On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:



$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$



But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.



Two questions:



  1. Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?

  2. How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have been asked to calculate a general formula for $1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + ... + Nb^N$



I think that a part of this is a geometric sequence, and I have rewritten this as



$f(x) = 1 + sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$



(I couldn't figure out a way to make the first term be 1 with the progression so I just removed it from the series instead)



When I look on Wolfram Alpha it says that the partial sum formula for $ sum_i=1^n icdot x^i$ is:



$$sum_i=1^n icdot x^i = frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2$$



On this question, an answer said that the general formula for the sum of a finite geometric series is:



$$sum_k=0^n-1x^k = frac1-x^n1-x$$



But if I substitute my ($icdot x^i$) into the formula mentioned above I don't get the same value as the one Wolfram gives me.



Two questions:



  1. Is it correct to pull the first term out of the series so it becomes a geometric series, or is there another way?

  2. How did Wolfram Alpha calculate that expression?






calculus






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago









Max

881318




881318






New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 12 hours ago









JoonJoon

1185




1185




New contributor




Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Joon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
    $endgroup$
    – Joon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    12 hours ago













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
    $endgroup$
    – Joon
    12 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    12 hours ago








4




4




$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
12 hours ago





$begingroup$
The ratio of successive terms is not constant, so this is not a geometric sequence, though it may be related to one
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
12 hours ago













$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you @J.W.Tanner, I will edit the question
$endgroup$
– Joon
12 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Ok; by the way, I think we meant series (sum) rather than sequence
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
12 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
12 hours ago





$begingroup$
This page could be helpful: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2782812/finite-sum-kxk. Or you can let $S = x + 2x^2 + 3x^3 + cdots +nx^n$, and consider $S - xS$, and make sure you know the geometric series formula.
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
12 hours ago











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:





It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
    $endgroup$
    – Joon
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
    $endgroup$
    – KKZiomek
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
    $endgroup$
    – KKZiomek
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
    $endgroup$
    – Joon
    9 hours ago



















8












$begingroup$

The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$

    Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.



    Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:



    Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.



    Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
    Thus,



    beginalign
    sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
    &=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
    endalign



    So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:



      $$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$



        Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
        $$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
        $$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$



        Do that again
        $$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
        $$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$



        Finally simplify
        $$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$



        As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          Thank you for the understandable explanation!
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          8 hours ago










        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151564%2fhow-is-the-partial-sum-of-a-geometric-sequence-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:





        It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          10 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          9 hours ago
















        3












        $begingroup$

        Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:





        It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          10 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          9 hours ago














        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:





        It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Here's what I did to get the formula for partial sums of this series:





        It was too much to type in LaTeX, so just did it on paper. Hope you don't mind.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 12 hours ago

























        answered 12 hours ago









        KKZiomekKKZiomek

        2,2521640




        2,2521640











        • $begingroup$
          Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          10 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          9 hours ago

















        • $begingroup$
          Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          10 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
          $endgroup$
          – KKZiomek
          9 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
          $endgroup$
          – Joon
          9 hours ago
















        $begingroup$
        Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
        $endgroup$
        – Joon
        10 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Thank you! Could you please explain how you know to add the (1 - x) / (1 - x) to the series?
        $endgroup$
        – Joon
        10 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
        $endgroup$
        – KKZiomek
        9 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        @Joon it's just a clever trick. There's really no reason why would one multiply and divide by (1-x). I guess it just works :)
        $endgroup$
        – KKZiomek
        9 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
        $endgroup$
        – KKZiomek
        9 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        If you analyze it closely you see that it cleverly cancels out like terms in a fashion that creates a geometric sequence. So I guess to know to multiply by (1-x) you have to observe and be clever. I didn't come up with this method. I found it in some paper about sequences long time ago
        $endgroup$
        – KKZiomek
        9 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
        $endgroup$
        – Joon
        9 hours ago





        $begingroup$
        Thank you again, I could understand your method and follow along. Really appreciate it
        $endgroup$
        – Joon
        9 hours ago












        8












        $begingroup$

        The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          8












          $begingroup$

          The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            8












            8








            8





            $begingroup$

            The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The extra factor of $i$ or $k$ or whatever you call it means we no longer have a geometric series, but we can get one by differentiating with respect to $x$. You'll want to check powers of $x$ carefully too.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago

























            answered 12 hours ago









            J.G.J.G.

            30.5k23148




            30.5k23148





















                5












                $begingroup$

                Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.



                Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:



                Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.



                Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
                Thus,



                beginalign
                sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                &=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
                &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
                &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
                &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
                &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
                &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
                endalign



                So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$

















                  5












                  $begingroup$

                  Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.



                  Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:



                  Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.



                  Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
                  Thus,



                  beginalign
                  sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                  &=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                  &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
                  &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
                  &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
                  &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
                  &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
                  &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
                  endalign



                  So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$















                    5












                    5








                    5





                    $begingroup$

                    Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.



                    Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:



                    Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.



                    Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
                    Thus,



                    beginalign
                    sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                    &=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
                    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
                    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
                    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
                    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
                    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
                    endalign



                    So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$



                    Your presumptions are wrong. The first series is not a geometric series. and substituting $i*x^i$ into $sum_k=0^N x^k$ is not the same as $sum_i=0^Ni*x^i$.



                    Try to solve the problem using the principle of induction:



                    Let us assume the above relation holds for $n$: $sum_i=0^n ix^i=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2equiv=A_n$.



                    Now let us show it must also holds for $n+1$ and therefore for all $ninmathcalN$.
                    Thus,



                    beginalign
                    sum_i=0^n+1ix^i&=underbracesum_i=0^nix^i_=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                    &=A_n+(n+1)x^n+1\
                    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1\
                    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x(1-x)^2+(n+1)x^n+1frac(1-x)^2(1-x)^2\
                    &=frac(nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1*(x-1)^2(1-x)^2\
                    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl((nx-n-1)x^n+1+x+(n+1)x^n+1(1+x^2-2x)biggr)\
                    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^n+2((n+1)x-n-2)+xbiggr)\
                    &=frac1(1-x)^2biggl(x^(n+1)+1((n+1)x-(n+1)-1)+xbiggr)
                    endalign



                    So if it holds for any $n$ it must hold for $n+1$ too and therefore for all natural numbers. Now, you only have to check that it holds for $n=0$ or $n=1$ and you are done.







                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 8 hours ago





















                    New contributor




                    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 12 hours ago









                    Gkhan CebsGkhan Cebs

                    713




                    713




                    New contributor




                    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Gkhan Cebs is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:



                        $$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$

















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:



                          $$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$















                            3












                            3








                            3





                            $begingroup$

                            Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:



                            $$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Hint: Think derivatives w.r.t. $b,$:



                            $$1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + dotsm + Nb^N=bsum_k=1^Nk,b^k-1=bBigl(sum_k=0^Nb^kBigr)^!!'$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 1 hour ago

























                            answered 12 hours ago









                            BernardBernard

                            123k741116




                            123k741116





















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$



                                Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
                                $$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
                                $$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$



                                Do that again
                                $$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
                                $$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$



                                Finally simplify
                                $$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$



                                As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Thank you for the understandable explanation!
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Joon
                                  8 hours ago















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$



                                Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
                                $$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
                                $$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$



                                Do that again
                                $$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
                                $$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$



                                Finally simplify
                                $$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$



                                As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Thank you for the understandable explanation!
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Joon
                                  8 hours ago













                                1












                                1








                                1





                                $begingroup$

                                Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$



                                Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
                                $$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
                                $$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$



                                Do that again
                                $$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
                                $$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$



                                Finally simplify
                                $$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$



                                As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                Start with $$S=1 + b + 2b^2 + 3b^3 + cdots + Nb^N$$



                                Multiply by $b$ and then subtract to give
                                $$bS=b + b^2 + 2b^3 + 3b^4 + cdots +(N-1)b^N + Nb^N+1$$
                                $$(b-1)S = -1 - b^2 - b^3 - b^4 - cdots -b^N + Nb^N+1$$



                                Do that again
                                $$b(b-1)S = -b - b^3 - b^4 - b^5 - cdots -b^N-b^N+1 - Nb^N+2$$
                                $$(b-1)^2S = 1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2$$



                                Finally simplify
                                $$S = dfrac1-b +b^2 -(N+1)b^N+1 + Nb^N+2(b-1)^2.$$



                                As an example, with $b=2$ and $N=3$ the first line gives $S=1+2+8+24=35$ while the final line gives $S=frac1-2+4-64+961^2= 35$







                                share|cite|improve this answer












                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                answered 8 hours ago









                                HenryHenry

                                101k481168




                                101k481168











                                • $begingroup$
                                  Thank you for the understandable explanation!
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Joon
                                  8 hours ago
















                                • $begingroup$
                                  Thank you for the understandable explanation!
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Joon
                                  8 hours ago















                                $begingroup$
                                Thank you for the understandable explanation!
                                $endgroup$
                                – Joon
                                8 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                Thank you for the understandable explanation!
                                $endgroup$
                                – Joon
                                8 hours ago










                                Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Joon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151564%2fhow-is-the-partial-sum-of-a-geometric-sequence-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                J. J. Abrams Índice Traxectoria | Filmografía | Premios | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióne"J.J. Abrams: Biography"Arquivado"'Star Trek' sequel on track"Arquivado"J.J. Abrams Producing Samurai Jack Movie"Arquivado"EXCLUSIVE: J.J. Abrams Goes Into Warp Speed with Star Trek and Beyond"Arquivado"David Semel To Direct Jonah Nolan/J.J. Abrams' CBS Pilot 'Person Of Interest'"Arquivado"Fox orders J.J. Abrams pilot 'Alcatraz'"ArquivadoJ. J. AbramsJ. J. AbramsWorldCat81800131p24091041000XX116709414031616ma11226833654496ID052246713376222X511412nm00091900000 0001 1772 5428no98124254ID0000002883100650044xx0054597000141374297344064w64f2mjx14255303415344

                                Станькаў Зьмест Назва | Гісторыя | Насельніцтва | Турыстычная інфармацыя | Галерэя | Асобы | Заўвагі | Крыніцы | Літаратура | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню53°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.2277853°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.22778djvu"Бабёнка – это я понимаю!". Як русіфікавалі тапонімы.Святыя руіны ажываюць210Станькаўв. СтанькаваСтаньково: история и новости - сайт деревниСтанькава: сядзіба Гутэн-Чапскіхррр

                                Андора Зьмест Гісторыя | Палітыка | Адміністрацыйны падзел | Геаграфія | Эканоміка | Дэмаграфія | Крыніцы | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню"CIA World Factbook entry: Andorra"."Andorra 2008, Departament d'estadística d'Andorra"Андорарр