Error: “inconsistent hash”. Workers crash and node is unable to connect to othersGeneric baking error on mainRegarding Baker-Node interactionHow do I remove the private mode setting from my node? My node is not connecting to peerError: Tezos_stdlib__Lwt_pipe.Closed for “ideal front node configuration”Node synchronizationRun Alphanet and Mainnet on the same VPSMake compilation errorWhat are the recommended requirements for running a nodeNode stops with 'Cannot open /dev/urandom' errorCannot import secret key ledger

Writing in a Christian voice

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

How to generate binary array whose elements with values 1 are randomly drawn

A Ri-diddley-iley Riddle

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

Is there a term for accumulated dirt on the outside of your hands and feet?

Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables

How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?

Generic TVP tradeoffs?

Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived​?

Unfrosted light bulb

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Help prove this basic trig identity please!

Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

How does 取材で訪れた integrate into this sentence?

Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?



Error: “inconsistent hash”. Workers crash and node is unable to connect to others


Generic baking error on mainRegarding Baker-Node interactionHow do I remove the private mode setting from my node? My node is not connecting to peerError: Tezos_stdlib__Lwt_pipe.Closed for “ideal front node configuration”Node synchronizationRun Alphanet and Mainnet on the same VPSMake compilation errorWhat are the recommended requirements for running a nodeNode stops with 'Cannot open /dev/urandom' errorCannot import secret key ledger













2















I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq









share|improve this question




























    2















    I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
    Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq









    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2


      1






      I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq









      share|improve this question
















      I'm consistently getting the below errors. What stands out is the "inconsistent hash" error, seemingly causing the workers to crash. The hash of the block header and this of the local hash seem to differ. I have no idea what this means though. Does anyone know how to solve this issue?



      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idsMwfkFJFTX]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(151): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker started for NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Validation of block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD failed
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Pushed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Treated: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z, Failed: 2019-03-17T15:14:35Z
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.block: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Unexpected error (validator):
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Error:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline: block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - node.validator.bootstrap_pipeline:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Worker crashed [NetXdQprcVkpa:idrhpgmWuEDG]:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): Inconsistent hash:
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
      Mar 17 15:14:35 - validator.peer(152): block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq






      node tezos-client error






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 11 hours ago







      MarcB

















      asked 11 hours ago









      MarcBMarcB

      14719




      14719




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            9 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "698"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f800%2ferror-inconsistent-hash-workers-crash-and-node-is-unable-to-connect-to-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            9 hours ago
















          3














          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            9 hours ago














          3












          3








          3







          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.






          share|improve this answer













          I was able to solve the issue myself. My node had rejected a seemingly valid block. I found this out by listing the rejected blocks of the node:



          tezos-admin-client list rejected blocks

          Output:
          Hash: BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD
          Level: 356181
          Error:
          Inconsistent hash:
          local: CoWYi7Nmm91pS8ZNXscNTt6uBpNdaWtpantEc3HcV3XASYEVriNS
          block_header: CoVHuYH6TpDbJjXFqRsZXichbxdnvqWrDSaGpjVAsJRknAMk8Lkq


          So the node rejected the block due to the different hashes of the headers and was not able to catch up, because it likely rejected a valid block.



          I solved this issue by unmarking the block:



          tezos-admin-client unmark invalid BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD

          Output:
          Block BLqhrPaH6WQtVYZssbonME7DPiQLTvZyidkYa8dvAxxoeTsnVKD no longer marked invalid.


          I still have no idea why this happened.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 11 hours ago









          MarcBMarcB

          14719




          14719







          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            9 hours ago













          • 1





            Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

            – Ezy
            9 hours ago








          1




          1





          Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

          – Ezy
          9 hours ago






          Well done on findint this out and thanks for letting us know! You may want to file a ticket on tezos gitlab for further help on why this happened: gitlab.com/tezos/tezos/issues you can always point back to this question.

          – Ezy
          9 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Tezos Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftezos.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f800%2ferror-inconsistent-hash-workers-crash-and-node-is-unable-to-connect-to-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          J. J. Abrams Índice Traxectoria | Filmografía | Premios | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióne"J.J. Abrams: Biography"Arquivado"'Star Trek' sequel on track"Arquivado"J.J. Abrams Producing Samurai Jack Movie"Arquivado"EXCLUSIVE: J.J. Abrams Goes Into Warp Speed with Star Trek and Beyond"Arquivado"David Semel To Direct Jonah Nolan/J.J. Abrams' CBS Pilot 'Person Of Interest'"Arquivado"Fox orders J.J. Abrams pilot 'Alcatraz'"ArquivadoJ. J. AbramsJ. J. AbramsWorldCat81800131p24091041000XX116709414031616ma11226833654496ID052246713376222X511412nm00091900000 0001 1772 5428no98124254ID0000002883100650044xx0054597000141374297344064w64f2mjx14255303415344

          Станькаў Зьмест Назва | Гісторыя | Насельніцтва | Турыстычная інфармацыя | Галерэя | Асобы | Заўвагі | Крыніцы | Літаратура | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню53°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.2277853°37′48″ пн. ш. 27°13′40″ у. д. / 53.63° пн. ш. 27.22778° у. д. / 53.63; 27.22778djvu"Бабёнка – это я понимаю!". Як русіфікавалі тапонімы.Святыя руіны ажываюць210Станькаўв. СтанькаваСтаньково: история и новости - сайт деревниСтанькава: сядзіба Гутэн-Чапскіхррр

          Андора Зьмест Гісторыя | Палітыка | Адміністрацыйны падзел | Геаграфія | Эканоміка | Дэмаграфія | Крыніцы | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню"CIA World Factbook entry: Andorra"."Andorra 2008, Departament d'estadística d'Andorra"Андорарр