Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeondifferential and linear cryptanalysisDifference between linear cryptanalysis and differential cryptanalysisWhat is the complexity for attacking 3DES in linear or differential cryptanalysis?Differential CryptanalysisDifferential & linear characteristics for integer multiplicationWhat is the meaning of Maximum Expected Differential/Linear Probability (MEDP/MELP)?Understanding the wide trail design strategyit is possible to use quantum algorithm search (Grover's algorithm) for new searching strategies for differential and linear attacksLinear cryptanalysis and number of linear approximationsHow does linear vs. non-linear operations relate to cryptographic security and differential cryptanalysis?

Loading the leaflet Map in Lightning Web Component

What does "mu" mean as an interjection?

Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?

What does Jesus mean regarding "Raca," and "you fool?" - is he contrasting them?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables

Practical application of matrices and determinants

Brake pads destroying wheels

Describing a chess game in a novel

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?

Help prove this basic trig identity please!

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?

What does "^L" mean in C?

Does the attack bonus from a Masterwork weapon stack with the attack bonus from Masterwork ammunition?

Inhabiting Mars versus going straight for a Dyson swarm

Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?

Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?

Unfrosted light bulb

Fewest number of steps to reach 200 using special calculator

Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions



Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeon


differential and linear cryptanalysisDifference between linear cryptanalysis and differential cryptanalysisWhat is the complexity for attacking 3DES in linear or differential cryptanalysis?Differential CryptanalysisDifferential & linear characteristics for integer multiplicationWhat is the meaning of Maximum Expected Differential/Linear Probability (MEDP/MELP)?Understanding the wide trail design strategyit is possible to use quantum algorithm search (Grover's algorithm) for new searching strategies for differential and linear attacksLinear cryptanalysis and number of linear approximationsHow does linear vs. non-linear operations relate to cryptographic security and differential cryptanalysis?













5












$begingroup$


In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :




The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatornameLambda(a)$. The fact that the
relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
inverse is its transpose.




I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).



Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :




    The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
    step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
    both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatornameLambda(a)$. The fact that the
    relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
    Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
    inverse is its transpose.




    I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).



    Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$


      In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :




      The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
      step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
      both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatornameLambda(a)$. The fact that the
      relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
      Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
      inverse is its transpose.




      I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).



      Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In the Noekeon Cipher Specification they write the following :




      The propagation through Lambda is denoted by $(a rightarrow A)$, also called a
      step. Because of the linearity of Lambda it is fully deterministic:
      both for LC and DC patterns, we have: $A = operatornameLambda(a)$. The fact that the
      relation is the same for LC and DC is thanks to the fact that the
      Lambda is an orthogonal function. If represented in a matrix, its
      inverse is its transpose.




      I'm having a hard time understanding why the orthogonality of Lambda affects the relation with regards to selection patterns (LC).



      Why does the orthogonality of Lambda make it so that the relationship is the same as for DC ? How would the selection pattern propagate through the linear layer if Lambda was not orthogonal ?







      cryptanalysis block-cipher linear-cryptanalysis differential-analysis






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 12 hours ago







      Yuon

















      asked 13 hours ago









      YuonYuon

      787




      787




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
          Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbbF_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
          In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy



          $$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$



          A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy



          $$u_2 = L^-top,u_1$$



          An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbbF_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^-top,u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.



          If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^-T = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuon
            8 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "281"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68085%2fdifferential-and-linear-trail-propagation-in-noekeon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
          Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbbF_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
          In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy



          $$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$



          A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy



          $$u_2 = L^-top,u_1$$



          An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbbF_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^-top,u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.



          If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^-T = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuon
            8 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
          Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbbF_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
          In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy



          $$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$



          A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy



          $$u_2 = L^-top,u_1$$



          An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbbF_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^-top,u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.



          If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^-T = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuon
            8 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
          Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbbF_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
          In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy



          $$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$



          A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy



          $$u_2 = L^-top,u_1$$



          An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbbF_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^-top,u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.



          If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^-T = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is due to the duality between linear and differential trails.
          Let $L$ be an invertible linear map on $mathbbF_2^n$, think of it as a matrix for convenience.
          In general, a nonzero differential $Delta_1 to Delta_2$ over $L$ must satisfy



          $$Delta_2 = L,Delta_1.$$



          A nonzero linear approximation $u_1 to u_2$, however, must satisfy



          $$u_2 = L^-top,u_1$$



          An elementary way to see this is to observe that $u_1^top x = u_2^top (Lx)$ is equivalent to $u_1^top x = (L^top,u_2)^top x$. This holds for all $x in mathbbF_2^n$ whenever $u_2 = L^-top,u_1$, and otherwise for half (some hyperplane) the $x$.



          If $L$ is orthogonal, then $L^-T = L$. So then we have both $Delta_2 = LDelta_1$ and $u_2 = L u_1$.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 9 hours ago









          AlephAleph

          1,3061220




          1,3061220











          • $begingroup$
            I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuon
            8 hours ago

















          • $begingroup$
            I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuon
            8 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
          $endgroup$
          – Yuon
          8 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          I suspected it was because of something like that. Could you just give some intuition as to why we want $u^T_1 x = u^T_2(Lx)$ in first place ? If I had to come up with that, I'd think it's the other way around $u^T_2 x = u^T_1 (Lx)$ just like the differential case.
          $endgroup$
          – Yuon
          8 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Cryptography Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcrypto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68085%2fdifferential-and-linear-trail-propagation-in-noekeon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Андора Зьмест Гісторыя | Палітыка | Адміністрацыйны падзел | Геаграфія | Эканоміка | Дэмаграфія | Крыніцы | Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню"CIA World Factbook entry: Andorra"."Andorra 2008, Departament d'estadística d'Andorra"Андорарр

          J. J. Abrams Índice Traxectoria | Filmografía | Premios | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióne"J.J. Abrams: Biography"Arquivado"'Star Trek' sequel on track"Arquivado"J.J. Abrams Producing Samurai Jack Movie"Arquivado"EXCLUSIVE: J.J. Abrams Goes Into Warp Speed with Star Trek and Beyond"Arquivado"David Semel To Direct Jonah Nolan/J.J. Abrams' CBS Pilot 'Person Of Interest'"Arquivado"Fox orders J.J. Abrams pilot 'Alcatraz'"ArquivadoJ. J. AbramsJ. J. AbramsWorldCat81800131p24091041000XX116709414031616ma11226833654496ID052246713376222X511412nm00091900000 0001 1772 5428no98124254ID0000002883100650044xx0054597000141374297344064w64f2mjx14255303415344

          Сэнт-Люіс Вонкавыя спасылкі | Навігацыйнае мэню38°37′38″ пн. ш. 90°11′52″ з. д. / 38.62722° пн. ш. 90.19778° з. д. / 38.62722; -90.1977838°37′38″ пн. ш. 90°11′52″ з. д. / 38.62722° пн. ш. 90.19778° з. д. / 38.62722; -90.19778stlouis-mo.govСэнт-ЛюісAnnual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places – U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division